Full Text Request
Full Text Request
Full Text Request
Full Text Request
There are 5 (five) potential areas for increasing support from foreign development partners and the private sector, namely: development of infrastructure and technology, health cadres, competency of heads of Community Health Centers, Community Health Center business as a Regional Public Service Agency, and integration of central and regional government policies. The consortium can also be maintained and strengthened through strong leadership, clarity of policy and direction, open communication, coordination of resource mobilization and opportunities to share good practices. The consortium also has the potential to become intensive coordination space between ministries/institutions and regional governments as well as global policy advocacy space.
Full Text RequestThe SPM Achievement Index includes the achievement of Basic Service Quality and the achievement of Basic Service recipients. Basic Service Quality Achievement is the achievement of the minimum quality of basic services obtained from the average of the sub-Performance Indicators for achieving the minimum quality of goods, services, and human resources in accordance with Technical Standards. Basic Service recipient achievement is the achievement obtained through Targets and Performance Indicators. To increase the achievement of SPM in the health sector to 100%, it is necessary to immediately revise Minister of Health Regulation Number 4 of 2019 in accordance with Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 59 of 2021.
The achievement of minimum service standards is also supported by the policy/regulation of 14 (fourteen) indicators of SPM in the health sector with the existence of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health which revokes several laws in the health sector, a Draft Government Regulation is also being prepared as its implementation which will also revoke previously stipulated Government Regulations, as well as various implementing regulations regulated by the Regulation of the Minister of Health.
The Minimum Service Standard Indicators are determined based on Government Regulation Number 2 of 2018, for adjustments in accordance with Law Number 17 of 2023, further analysis is needed regarding these indicators as a proposal for revising Government Regulation Number 2 of 2018.
Full Text Request
Full Text Request
- Establishing the Ministry of Health's position in international trade negotiation forums.
- Utilization of the economic cooperation committee in order to fulfill export provisions and health product standards in partner countries, as well as increasing the competitiveness of domestic health products and improving the competency standards of Indonesian health human resources (HRK).
- Establishment of a Negotiating Team for Trade in Health Goods and Services at the Ministry of Health.
- Review and alignment of Indonesian legislation related to the health sector with the position of the Ministry of Health.
- Health Goods Trade Negotiations:
- Categorization of health sector openness positions (offers): offensive, moderate, and defensive.
- Priority arrangement of health sector request positions: priority 1, priority 2, and priority 3.
- Determination of sub-sectors and human resources whose market access is opened to partner countries (offer).
- Preparation of sub-sectors and human resources for which market access will be requested to partner countries (request).
The utilization of specialist doctors in Indonesia is a crucial issue in efforts to improve access and quality of national healthcare services. Currently, the shortage of specialist doctors remains a major challenge, particularly with the ratio of doctors in Indonesia at only 0,47 per 1.000 residents, far below the WHO minimum standard of 1 doctor per 1.000 residents. The availability of specialist doctors and subspecialists also remains very minimal. This problem is exacerbated by the uneven distribution of specialist doctors and subspecialists, with the majority of doctors concentrated on the island of Java, while remote and underdeveloped areas experience limited medical services. This situation impacts public access to quality healthcare and is expected to persist until 2032 if no concrete action is taken. The increasing need for specialist doctors, disproportionate to the availability of medical personnel, further underscores the urgency of policy improvements in this sector.
One solution that can be implemented is faster and more efficient recognition of specialist doctors who are Indonesian citizens (WNI) or foreign nationals (WNA) who graduated from abroad. Based on Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024, doctors and specialists who graduated from abroad are required to take a competency test before practicing in Indonesia. However, there are exceptions for Indonesian citizens who graduated from recognized foreign educational institutions and have at least two years of practice experience abroad or foreign nationals (specifically for specialist doctors and subspecialists) who have practiced abroad for five years. This aims to quickly integrate qualified doctors, specialists, and subspecialists into the Indonesian healthcare system.
One proposed policy is to recognize foreign educational institutions based on the criteria and list of institutions in scholarship schemes (such as LPDP). The government can adopt the stages, criteria, and list of recognized foreign universities benchmarked in regulations in Singapore and Malaysia. Furthermore, clear and comprehensive regulations are needed to provide a legal basis for strengthening the role of the College, working with the Ministry of Health to conduct ongoing monitoring and evaluation to maintain healthcare standards in Indonesia.
Full Text RequestThere has been a significant increase in foreign grant commitments for the health sector in Indonesia, with total commitments reaching 11,4 trillion rupiah from various international partners between 2021 and 2025. However, grant management policies, particularly Minister of Health Regulation No. 55 of 2017, do not fully accommodate the need for optimal grant reporting and monitoring and evaluation (M&E). Governance limitations result in many grants going unreported or underdocumented, hampering the transparency and effectiveness of grant fund use.
Minister of Health Regulation No. 55 of 2017 regulates grant management procedures, including various types of reporting. However, implementation in the field faces several obstacles, including:
-
Mismatches between reporting policies and practices, with no obligation for partners to report activities, resulting in incomplete grant data.
-
Variations in monitoring and evaluation (monev) systems between units, lead to duplication of reporting and additional burdens for development partners.
-
The limitations of the report's substance do not adequately describe the achievement of targets.
-
Lack of partner understanding of policies and reporting, which hinders the effectiveness of grant management.
Target Policy:
-
Ministry of Health
-
Health Development Partners
Recommendation:
-
Revise the grant reporting policy by regulating the roles and obligations of partners in reporting and evaluation.
-
Development of monitoring and evaluation guidelines for development partners that clarify stakeholder roles and responsibilities to ensure coordination and accountability.
-
Developing integrated real-time monitoring and evaluation instruments that are accessible to all relevant parties, enabling efficient monitoring and analysis of achievements.
-
Increased regular coordination between technical units, development partners, and grant recipient work units to strengthen understanding and response to problems.
Follow-up:
Conducting cross-sectoral workshops to disseminate proposed policies, guidelines, and monitoring and evaluation instruments. Integrating monitoring and evaluation instruments into the Ministry of Health's digital information system.
This summary highlights the need for policy updates to ensure that grant funding supports Indonesia's health sector transformation goals more effectively and accountably.
Full Text Request- The Ministry of Health has adjusted the narrative in the RPMK for Health Supplies by not using statements containing technical barriers to trade.
- BPOM, as the technical body implementing drug registration and supervision, creates technical regulations governing the implementation of the RPMK for Medical Supplies by considering aspects of public health protection and immediately notifies the WTO after the issuance of new regulations regarding the registration of imported drugs.
